LOGIC

 

ETHICS

 

perceiving information

·     focused foremost on demands of material, nonhuman world, or world of “things” in one’s environment

·     perceive things mainly in terms of correct vs. incorrect, logical vs. illogical (i.e. how objectively true words and deeds are)

·     in communication focus on and study what is done and said, content of speech

·     focused foremost on demands of subjective human world, or world of people and relationships

·     perceive things mainly in terms of right vs. wrong, ethical vs. unethical (i.e. how words and deeds will affect people and their relationships)

·     in communication focus on and study people’s feelings and emotional state based on nonverbal information and how things are said

physiology

·     less expressive face and body language

·     more expressive face and body language

emotions

·     less outward emotional range

·     have more stable and long-term feelings for others

·     more emotional range and range of facial expression

·     more confident of and able to consciously control their feelings and emotions

·     adapt their emotional expression to those they interact with

intellectual qualities

·     task-oriented

·     focused on not misleading a person and giving them correct information

·     convincing others using facts and arguments

·     people-oriented

·     focused on enhancing relationships; modifying content and form of speech to match or contradict what others expect to hear

·     use emotions and feelings to persuade

strengths

·     dealing with objective (nonhuman) world

·     countering others’ flawed logic, actions, and procedures and explaining correct logic and procedures

·     making independent decisions in logical sphere

·     evaluating others’ honesty and deeds

·     working with subjective (human) world

·     persuasion

·     adding an emotional, subjective dimension to social interaction

·     making independent decisions in human sphere

·     evaluating others’ good will and positive or negative attitude

·     pleasing others and arousing emotions

typical talents

·     working with inanimate objects and resources

·     technology, equipment, working with mechanisms

·     creating and understanding procedures and instructions

·     creating a good impression on the right people; public relations

·     helping others release emotional tension in individual interaction and social settings

·     being “the life of the party”

norms or “rules of thumb”

·     try to strictly follow others’ ethical norms and rules of thumb for demonstrating emotions and feelings

·     try to use formal logic in discussions and read up on scientific and/or technical literature to increase their self-confidence

weaknesses

·     ethics

·     often feel helpless when forced to deal with others’ feelings, emotional reactions, and subjective factors

·     more subject to emotional manipulation and not recognizing others’ true feelings and attitudes in time

·     evaluating how much work has been done and how much remains to do

·     opinions more easily influenced by others’ logic and arguments

·     more subject to manipulation through dishonest, incorrect, or inconsistent information and deeds

typical doubts

·     often doubt whether they deserve unsure of their right to have feelings for others and demonstrate emotions

·     often unsure that their partner really has feelings for them

·     often unsure of their ability to work and get things done or whether they have done enough work

 

behavior in relationships

·     manage and diversify structure of relationship

·     show their feelings for partner by doing things for them

·     manage and diversify emotional aspects of relationship

·     show their feelings for partner directly through emotions

 

 

Logic and Ethics and how visually identify this.
This is a translated page from Tipologs site.

It explains the difference between Logic and Ethics and how visually identify this.

This is the original page

 

Index